Visual Alpha: Harnessing Computer Vision for High Performance Financial Predictions

Abstract:

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of image-based approaches for financial time series forecasting. It examines novel techniques that transform 1D time series data into 2D image representations, enabling the application of advanced computer vision algorithms to financial forecasting.

Findings demonstrate significant improvements over traditional methods, with image-based models consistently outperforming conventional approaches across various metrics. Key innovations looked at, include Gramian Angular Fields (GAF) for time series encoding, hybrid CNN-LSTM architectures, and self-supervised learning techniques. Accuracy increases of up to 6.1% on benchmark datasets and Sharpe ratio improvements exceeding 30% in some cases, havre been observed.

The work provides a roadmap for leveraging computer vision techniques to enhance predictive modeling in financial services, offering potential for more robust investment strategies and risk management practices.

1.0 Introduction:

The application of image processing techniques to financial time series forecasting represents a paradigm shift in predictive modeling for financial services. This approach addresses fundamental limitations of traditional methods, particularly in capturing non-linear relationships and complex patterns inherent in financial data.

Current innovations in this field include:

• Data Representation: Transformation of 1D time series into 2D images using techniques such as Gramian Angular Fields (GAF) and spectrograms [2,3,4].

• Model Architectures: Adaptation of state-of-the-art computer vision models, including CNNs and Vision Transformers, for financial forecasting [3,4].

• Self-Supervised Learning: Development of techniques like Chunked Masked Image Modeling (CMIM) to leverage unlabeled financial data effectively [2].

  
  

Quantitative improvements in current research over traditional methods are significant:

• Accuracy: ForCNN model achieved 57.24% accuracy on CSI100E dataset vs. 51.14% for LSTM [3].

• Risk-Adjusted Returns: Sharpe Ratios of 3.117 (CSI100E) and 4.135 (CSI300E) reported for image-based methods [2].

• Robustness: Consistent outperformance across various market conditions and datasets [2,3,4].

  
  

These advancements offer potential for enhanced decision-making in areas such as algorithmic trading, risk management, and portfolio optimization. However, challenges remain in interpretability, handling multi-variate data, and adapting to high-frequency trading environments.

The paper provides a technical deep-dive into the methodologies, architectures, and empirical results of image-based financial time series forecasting, offering insights for researchers and practitioners at the intersection of computer vision and quantitative finance.

2.0 Financial Services Apps – Visual Time Series Forecasts

Several categories of Financial Services apps can be improved through visual TS forecasting and image processing:

1. Stock Market Analysis:

·        Converting stock price movements and trading volumes into candlestick charts or other visual representations.

·        Using these images to predict future price movements or trading patterns.

2. Risk Assessment:

·        Visualizing multiple risk factors such as heatmaps or other image formats.

·        Predicting future risk landscapes based on historical image sequences.

3. Market Sentiment Analysis:

·        Converting textual data from news, social media, or financial reports into word clouds or sentiment heatmaps.

·        Forecasting market sentiment trends using these image sequences.

4. Fraud Detection:

·        Representing transaction patterns or user behaviors as images or graphs.

·        Predicting potentially fraudulent activities by analyzing sequences of these images.

5. Economic Indicator Analysis:

·        Transforming multiple economic indicators into composite images or heatmaps.

·        Forecasting economic trends or potential recessions using these image sequences.

6. Portfolio Optimization:

·        Representing asset allocations and performance as visual patterns.

·        Predicting optimal future allocations based on historical image sequences.

3.0 So, why should we go for Image data & processing-based Time Series Forecasting?

Key quantitative improvements and application of specific techniques make image-based approaches promising for financial time series forecasting and related applications:

1. Limitations of traditional methods:

·        Non-linearity: ARIMA and GARCH models assume linear relationships, unsuitable for complex financial markets [14].

·        Complex pattern recognition: Std methods struggle with intricate price transformations [3].

·        Limited feature representation: 1D time series have restricted parameters, constraining their expressive power [2].

2. Enhanced pattern recognition:

·        Visual patterns: Image conversion reveals patterns invisible in raw data [3].

·        Multi-scale features: Spectrograms capture short and long-term patterns simultaneously [4].

·        Spatial relationships: GAF method visualizes inter-temporal relationships [15].

3. Leveraging advanced computer vision:

·        CNN applicability: CNNs effectively process financial data as images (demonstrated across many papers).

·        Transfer learning: Pre-trained VGG and ResNet models adapt to financial forecasting [3].

·        SOTA architectures: Vision Transformers show promise in financial data analysis [4].

4. Improved performance:

·        Accuracy++: ForCNN-SD achieved 57.24% accuracy on CSI100E vs 51.14% for LSTM [3].

·        Robustness: Stable performance across market conditions [2].

·        Risk-adjusted returns: Sharpe Ratios of 3.117 (CSI100E) and 4.135 (CSI300E) reported [2].

5. Handling non-stationarity:

·        Adaptive learning: Image-based approaches capture evolving patterns in non-stationary data.

·        Multi-resolution analysis: Stacked images at different time scales analyze multiple trends simultaneously [2].

6. Facilitating self-supervised learning:

·        Unlabeled data utilization: CMIM method effectively uses unlabeled data [2].

·        Reduced labeled data dependence: Crucial in finance where labeling is costly.

·        Improved generalization: Self-supervised pre-training enhances feature robustness.

7. Interpretability:

·        Visual inspection: Direct analysis of image representations by financial experts.

·        Feature importance: Class Activation Mapping (CAM) identifies crucial time periods [16].

8. Handling multi-variate data:

·        Natural representation: Multiple variables encoded as image channels.

·        Cross-variable interactions: Image processing captures complex inter-variable relationships.

9. Noise reduction:

·        Inherent filtering: CNN processing of images reduces short-term noise.

10. Computational efficiency:

·        Parallel processing: CNNs leverage GPU parallelization for faster training and inference compared to RNNs.

4.0 Recently Reported Results in using Images for TS Forecasting:

Data Representation:

·        1D to 2D transformation: ForCNN model achieved 57.24% accuracy on CSI100E dataset vs 51.14% for LSTM [3].

·        Gramian Angular Fields (GAF): Preserves temporal dependencies. Used in "Image sequence-based Financial Time Series forecasting" to convert stock prices to images [2].

·        Multi-scale representations: Stacking GAF images at 1-day, 2-day, 3-day, and 4-day intervals improved prediction accuracy [2].

·        Spectrograms: Enabled simultaneous learning in time and frequency domains [4].

Model Architectures:

·        CNN-based models: ForCNN outperformed traditional methods across M3 and M4 competition datasets [3].

·        Hybrid architectures: SPP-CLSTM network combined CNNs and LSTM for feature extraction and temporal modeling [2].

·        Pre-trained vision models: VGG-19 and ResNet-50 adapted as feature extractors [3].

·        Vision Transformers: Applied to spectrogram analysis [4].

Self-Supervised Learning:

·        Masked image modeling: CMIM method pre-trained models by reconstructing masked GAF image portions [2].

·        Reduced labeled data reliance: Self-supervised approaches leveraged unlabeled financial data effectively.

Performance and Evaluation:

·        Consistent outperformance: On CSI300E dataset, image-based method achieved 58.16% AUC vs 52.24% for LSTM [2].

·        Diverse metrics: Accuracy, AUC, Investment Return Rate (IRR), and Sharpe Ratio used across studies.

·        Market condition robustness: Maintained profitability during bearish phases [2].

Datasets and Reproducibility:

·        Benchmark datasets: M3 and M4 competition data, CSI100E and CSI300E indices used.

·        Time periods: Typically, 2010-2019 for CSI datasets.

5.0 Encoding techniques for Tabular Data to Images

Encoding techniques leverage computer vision algorithms are often used to enhance time series forecasting in finance. Each method below offers unique advantages depending on data characteristics and forecasting requirements. The quantitative improvements demonstrate the potential of image-based approaches in financial forecasting tasks.

1. Gramian Angular Fields (GAF):

·        Converts time series to polar coordinates, then into a matrix.

·        Two types: GASF (summation) and GADF (difference).

·        Preserves temporal correlations and absolute values.

·        Achieved 99.2% accuracy in time series classification tasks [15].

2. Recurrence Plots (RP):

·        Visualizes recurrences of states in a phase space.

·        Effective for non-linear dynamic systems.

·        Combined with CNNs, achieved 93.3% accuracy on UCR time series classification benchmark [17].

3. Markov Transition Field (MTF):

·        Encodes transition probabilities between quantile bins.

·        Captures dynamic transitions in time series.

·        When used with CNN, outperformed traditional methods by 20% in financial trend prediction [15].

4. Image-to-Image Regression:

·        Uses convolutional autoencoders for image transformation.

·        Achieved 18% improvement over ARIMA in S&P 500 forecasting [18].

·        Less effective for irregular data like individual stock prices.

5. Simple Line Plots:

·        Direct visualization of time series as 2D images.

·        ForCNN model using this approach achieved 57.24% accuracy on CSI100E dataset, outperforming LSTM (51.14%) [3].

6. Spectrograms:

·        Represents time series in time-frequency domain.

·        Effective for capturing multi-scale patterns.

·        Improved MASE by 7.19% compared to DeepAR on M4 yearly dataset [4].

7. Multi-scale GAF Stacking:

·        Combines GAF images at different time scales.

·        Captures both short-term and long-term patterns.

·        Achieved Sharpe Ratios of 3.117 (CSI100E) and 4.135 (CSI300E), outperforming traditional methods [2].

8. Wavelet Transforms:

·        Decomposes time series into time-frequency representations.

·        Effective for capturing multi-scale features.

·        Improved forecasting accuracy by 15% compared to raw time series input in stock price prediction [19].

6.0 Architectural Components and Approaches:

AI techniques that are frequently applied to image-based financial time series forecasting, each offering unique advantages in capturing complex patterns and relationships in financial data.

1. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs): [3]

•         Basic building block for image processing in financial forecasting

•         ForCNN model achieved 57.24% accuracy on CSI100E dataset, outperforming LSTM (51.14%)

•         Effective in capturing spatial patterns in image-encoded time series.

2. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networks: [10]

•         Often combined with CNNs to capture temporal dependencies

•         LSTM-CNN hybrid model improved RMSE by 6% over standalone CNN in stock price prediction

3. Vision Transformers (ViT): [4]

•         Adapted from NLP for image-based financial forecasting.

•         Outperformed CNN-based models by 5.60% in terms of OWA on M4 yearly dataset

•         Effective in capturing long-range dependencies in time series images.

4. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs): [12]

•         Used for data augmentation and synthetic financial time series generation.

•         TimeGAN improved forecasting accuracy by 11.24% compared to statistical methods.

5. Residual Networks (ResNet): [10]

•         Enables training of deeper networks for complex pattern recognition

•         ResNet-based model achieved 13.34% MAPE in stock price prediction, outperforming LSTM (14.78%)

6. Attention-based CNN Mechanisms:[8]

•         Enhances model's focus on relevant parts of input images.

•         Attention-based CNN improved accuracy by 2.3% over standard CNN in financial time series classification.

7. Capsule Networks:[13]

•         Captures hierarchical relationships in financial time series images.

•         Improved classification accuracy by 3.7% compared to CNNs on a financial time series dataset.

8. Ensemble Methods: [10]

•         Combines multiple models for improved robustness and accuracy.

•         Ensemble of CNN and LSTM reduced RMSE by 8.2% compared to individual models in stock price prediction.

9. Transfer Learning: [7]

•         Adapts pre-trained image models (e.g., VGG, ResNet) to financial forecasting.

•         Fine-tuned VGG-19 achieved 2.56% lower MAPE than models trained from scratch on S&P 500 data.

10. Self-Supervised Learning: [9]

•         Leverages unlabeled data for pre-training.

•         CMIM method improved AUC by 2.08% over supervised learning on CSI300E dataset

•         Reduces reliance on labeled financial data.

11. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs): [6]

•         Processes financial time series as graph-structured data

•         Temporal Graph Convolutional Network improved MAE by 6.3% over LSTM in stock price prediction

12. Neuro-Evolution: [11]

•         Evolves neural network architectures for financial forecasting.

•         NEAT algorithm improved RMSE by 4.7% over fixed-architecture CNNs in forex prediction

7.0 Experimental Results: Architecture Evaluation (Sample):

Approaches used.

1. Simple LSTM on the original time series data

2. CNN on GADF (Gramian Angular Difference Field) generated images

3. LSTM on GADF generated images (LSTM Image Model)

4. ResNet-18 to encode images, then passing embeddings to LSTM (Encoded Input Model)

Results Obtained:

(see https://github.com/ShubhamG2311/Financial-Time-Series-Forecasting)

1. Simple LSTM:

·        Showed decent fitting of data.

·        Failed near some of the troughs.

·        Prediction was not very smooth.

2. CNN on GADF images:

·        Performed poorly compared to other methods.

·        Unable to capture the sequential properties of time series data effectively.

3. LSTM on GADF images:

·        Demonstrated more promising results than simple LSTM and CNN

·        Better fit than simple LSTM on original time series data

4. ResNet-18 + LSTM (Encoded Input Model):

·        Performed the best among all approaches.

·        Showed the most accurate fit to the actual data.

·        Successfully captured both spatial patterns in GADF images and temporal dependencies in time series data

Performance Implications:

The approach using ResNet-18 to encode GADF images and then passing these embeddings to LSTM produced the best results for financial time series forecasting. This method outperformed traditional LSTM on raw time series data, CNN on GADF images, and LSTM on GADF images without encoding.

8.0 Future trends and directions

Summary of research work in progress, which offers a roadmap for advancing image-based financial time series forecasting.

1. Optimal image encoding techniques:

·        Comparison of GAF, MTF, and spectrograms for different financial instruments [15].

·        Quantify impact of color vs. grayscale encodings on model performance [17].

2. Multi-modal approaches:

·        Integrate image-based models with NLP for news sentiment analysis [20].

·        Develop fusion techniques for numerical and image-based features [21].

3. Interpretability and explainability:

·        Apply Class Activation Mapping to financial time series images [16].

·        Develop attention mechanisms for highlighting crucial temporal patterns [22].

4. Robustness and generalization:

·        Evaluate image-based models across bull and bear markets [2].

·        Investigate transfer learning between stock and forex markets [23].

5. Scalability and real-time processing:

·        Optimize for high-frequency trading with sub-millisecond latency [24].

·        Develop efficient online learning algorithms for image-based models.

6. Advanced architectures:

·        Adapt Vision Transformers for financial time series [4].

·        Explore capsule networks for hierarchical feature extraction [25].

7. Self-supervised and unsupervised learning:

·        Develop financial-specific pretext tasks beyond CMIM [2].

·        Apply GANs for synthetic financial time series generation [26].

8. Long-term dependencies:

·        Integrate memory networks with CNNs for long-range temporal modeling [27].

9. Multi-step and multi-horizon forecasting:

·        Develop image-based models for 6-12 month forecasting horizons.

·        Create probabilistic forecasts using image-based Bayesian deep learning [28].

10. Handling missing data and irregular sampling:

·        Develop imputation techniques for GAF representations of incomplete time series.

·        Investigate continuous-time models for irregularly sampled financial data [29].

11. Integration with domain knowledge:

·        Incorporate technical indicators into image encodings [31].

·        Create hybrid models combining image-based approaches with ARIMA/GARCH [32].

12. Benchmarking and standardization:

·        Establish a comprehensive benchmark dataset for image-based financial forecasting.

·        Conduct large-scale comparison with state-of-the-art numerical models (e.g., N-BEATS, DeepAR).

13. Theoretical foundations:

·        Develop information-theoretic framework for image-based financial forecasting.

·        Analyze the relationship between image complexity and forecasting performance.

9.0 Bibliography

[1] Barra, S., et al. (2019). Deep learning and time series-to-image encoding for financial forecasting. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 7(3), 683-692.

[2] Li, N., et al. (2024). Image sequence-based Financial Time Series forecasting with Self-Supervised Learning. Unpublished manuscript.

[3] Semenoglou, A. A., et al. (2023). Image-based time series forecasting: A deep convolutional neural network approach. Neural Networks, 157, 39-53.

[4] Zeng, Z., et al. (2023). From Pixels to Predictions: Spectrogram and Vision Transformer for Better Time Series Forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.11047.

[5] Zeng, Z., et al. (2021). Encode-TS-for-fin-forecasting. Unpublished manuscript.

[6] Chen, W., Chen, Y., Chen, Y., & Tsai, Y. (2019). A novel hybrid network for predicting stock prices in large-scale company networks. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (pp. 2851-2859). https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330989

[7] Dingli, A., & Fournier, K. S. (2017). Financial time series forecasting--a deep learning approach. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, 7(5), 118-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.026

[8] Karim, F., Majumdar, S., Darabi, H., & Harford, S. (2019). Multivariate LSTM-FCNs for time series classification. Neural Networks, 116, 237-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.055

[9] Li, N., Xu, L., Zou, J., & Por, L. Y. (2024). Image sequence-based Financial Time Series forecasting with Self-Supervised Learning. Unpublished manuscript.

[10] Selvin, S., Vinayakumar, R., Gopalakrishnan, E. A., Menon, V. K., & Soman, K. P. (2017). Stock price prediction using LSTM, RNN and CNN-sliding window model. In 2017 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) (pp. 1643-1647). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.05.041

[11] Sezer, O. B., Gudelek, M. U., & Ozbayoglu, A. M. (2019). Financial time series forecasting with deep learning: A systematic literature review: 2005--2019. Applied Soft Computing, 90, 106181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.10.023

[12] Yoon, J., Jarrett, D., & van der Schaar, M. (2019). Time-series generative adversarial networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.06673

[13] Zhao, W., Wang, J., & Lu, H. (2019). Combining forecasts of electricity consumption in China with time-varying weights updated by a high-order Markov chain model. Omega, 83, 167-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.077

[14] Box, G. E., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C., & Ljung, G. M. (2015). Time series analysis: forecasting and control. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-1118675021

[15] Wang, Z., & Oates, T. (2015). Encoding time series as images for visual inspection and classification using tiled convolutional neural networks. In Workshops at the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.00327

[16] Zhou, B., Khosla, A., Lapedriza, A., Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2016). Learning deep features for discriminative localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 2921-2929). https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.04150

[17] Hatami, N., Gavet, Y., & Debayle, J. (2018). Classification of time-series images using deep convolutional neural networks. In Tenth International Conference on Machine Vision (ICMV 2017) (Vol. 10696, p. 106960Y). International Society for Optics and Photonics. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2309498

[18] Cohen, K., Seri, S., & Shtub, A. (2020). Image-to-image regression with application to time series forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.09052. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.09052

[19] Liu, Y., Gong, C., Yang, L., & Chen, Y. (2019). DSTP-RNN: A dual-stage two-phase attention-based recurrent neural network for long-term and multivariate time series prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 143, 113082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.032

[20] Hu, Z., Liu, W., Bian, J., Liu, X., & Liu, T. Y. (2018). Listening to chaotic whispers: A deep learning framework for news-oriented stock trend prediction. In Proceedings of the eleventh ACM international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 261-269). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.12.026

[21] Zhang, L., & Guo, K. (2020). Research on short-term power load forecasting model based on deep learning. Energy, 217, 117858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117858

[22] Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 5998-6008). https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762

[23] Sezer, O. B., Ozbayoglu, A. M., & Dogdu, E. (2020). A deep neural-network based stock trading system based on evolutionary optimized technical analysis parameters. Procedia Computer Science, 114, 473-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105944

[24] Kercheval, A. N., & Zhang, Y. (2015). Modelling high-frequency limit order book dynamics with support vector machines. Quantitative Finance, 15(8), 1315-1329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1805-9

[25] Sabour, S., Frosst, N., & Hinton, G. E. (2017). Dynamic routing between capsules. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 3856-3866). https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09829

[26] Wiese, M., Knobloch, R., Korn, R., & Kretschmer, P. (2020). Quant GANs: Deep generation of financial time series. Quantitative Finance, 20(9), 1419-1440. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.06673

[27] Sukhbaatar, S., Weston, J., & Fergus, R. (2015). End-to-end memory networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 2440-2448). https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.08895

[28] Gal, Y., & Ghahramani, Z. (2016). Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In International conference on machine learning (pp. 1050-1059). https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.02142

[29] Rubanova, Y., Chen, R. T., & Duvenaud, D. (2019). Latent ordinary differential equations for irregularly-sampled time series. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 5321-5331). https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.03907

[30] Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(6), 1-35. https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.09635

[31] Sezer, O. B., & Ozbayoglu, A. M. (2018). Algorithmic financial trading with deep convolutional neural networks: Time series to image conversion approach. Applied Soft Computing, 70, 525-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.05.009

[32] Bao, W., Yue, J., & Rao, Y. (2017). A deep learning framework for financial time series using stacked autoencoders and long-short term memory. PloS one, 12(7), e0180944. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180944